No results for ‘’
KM Sugar Mills Ltd
NSE: KMSUGAR BSE: 532673
₹31.35
(0.13%)
Sat, 05 Sept 2026, 03:00 pm
Market Cap (in Cr)299
PE Ratio5.99
Dividend0
- Overview
- Analysis
- Financials
- Ratios
- shareholding
- Technical Analysis
- Corporate Actions
- Peer Comparison
- About
- Company History
- Deals
- News
- FAQs
KM Sugar Mills Analysis
dividend
Pros
Cons
- Unable to evaluate K.M. Sugar Mills's dividend yield against the bottom 25% of dividend payers as the company has not reported any payouts.
- Unable to evaluate K.M. Sugar Mills's dividend against the top 25% market benchmark as the company has not reported any payouts.
health
Pros
- K.M. Sugar Mills is able to meet its short term (1 year) commitments with its holdings of cash and other short term assets.
- K.M. Sugar Mills is profitable, therefore cash runway is not a concern.
- K.M. Sugar Mills is profitable, therefore cash runway is not a concern.
- Debt is covered by short term assets, assets are 2x debt.
- K.M. Sugar Mills's cash and other short term assets cover its long term commitments.
- The level of debt compared to net worth has been reduced over the past 5 years (826.3% vs 93.7% today).
Cons
- Operating cash flow is negative therefore debt is not well covered.
- Interest payments on debt are not well covered by earnings (EBIT is 2.5x annual interest expense, ideally 3x coverage).
- K.M. Sugar Mills's level of debt (93.7%) compared to net worth is high (greater than 40%).
- High level of physical assets or inventory.
management
Pros
- The average tenure for the K.M. Sugar Mills board of directors is over 10 years, this suggests they are a seasoned and experienced board.
- Subhash's remuneration is about average for companies of similar size in India.
- Subhash's compensation has been consistent with company performance over the past year, both up more than 20%.
- More shares have been bought than sold by K.M. Sugar Mills individual insiders in the past 3 months.
Cons
misc
Pros
Cons
- K.M. Sugar Mills is not covered by any analysts.
- K.M. Sugar Mills has significant price volatility in the past 3 months.
past
Pros
- K.M. Sugar Mills's year on year earnings growth rate has been positive over the past 5 years.
Cons
- K.M. Sugar Mills's 1-year earnings growth is negative, it can't be compared to the 5-year average.
- K.M. Sugar Mills used its assets less efficiently than the IN Food industry average last year based on Return on Assets.
- K.M. Sugar Mills's use of capital deteriorated last year versus 3 years ago (Return on Capital Employed).
- K.M. Sugar Mills has not efficiently used shareholders’ funds last year (Return on Equity less than 20%).
- K.M. Sugar Mills's 1-year earnings growth is negative, it can't be compared to the IN Food industry average.
value
Pros
- K.M. Sugar Mills is good value based on assets compared to the IN Food industry average.
- K.M. Sugar Mills is good value based on earnings compared to the IN Food industry average.
- K.M. Sugar Mills is good value based on earnings compared to the India market.
- KMSUGAR outperformed the Food industry which returned 18.8% over the past year.
- KMSUGAR outperformed the Market in India which returned -14.5% over the past year.
- NSEI:KMSUGAR is up 42.3% outperforming the Food industry which returned 5% over the past month.
- NSEI:KMSUGAR is up 42.3% outperforming the market in India which returned 8% over the past month.
Cons