Sampann Utpadan India Analysis

dividend

Pros

Cons

• Unable to evaluate S. E. Power's dividend yield against the bottom 25% of dividend payers as the company has not reported any payouts.
• Unable to evaluate S. E. Power's dividend against the top 25% market benchmark as the company has not reported any payouts.

health

Pros

• S. E. Power is able to meet its short term (1 year) commitments with its holdings of cash and other short term assets.

Cons

• Operating cash flow is negative therefore debt is not well covered.
• Debt is not covered by short term assets, assets are 0.2x debt.
• S. E. Power's long term commitments exceed its cash and other short term assets.
• The level of debt compared to net worth has increased over the past 5 years (81.2% vs 292.3% today).
• S. E. Power's level of debt (292.3%) compared to net worth is high (greater than 40%).
• High level of physical assets or inventory.

management

Pros

• Sachin's remuneration is lower than average for companies of similar size in India.
• The tenure for the S. E. Power management team is about average.

Cons

• The average tenure for the S. E. Power board of directors is less than 3 years, this suggests a new board.

misc

Pros

Cons

• S. E. Power is not covered by any analysts.
• S. E. Power has significant price volatility in the past 3 months.

past

Pros

Cons

• Unable to compare S. E. Power's 1-year earnings growth to the 5-year average as it is not currently profitable.
• S. E. Power does not make a profit and their year on year earnings growth rate was negative over the past 5 years.
• It is difficult to establish if S. E. Power has efficiently used its assets last year compared to the IN Chemicals industry average (Return on Assets) as it is loss-making.
• It is difficult to establish if S. E. Power improved its use of capital last year versus 3 years ago (Return on Capital Employed) as it is currently loss-making.
• It is difficult to establish if S. E. Power has efficiently used shareholders’ funds last year (Return on Equity greater than 20%) as it is loss-making.
• Unable to compare S. E. Power's 1-year growth to the IN Chemicals industry average as it is not currently profitable.

value

Pros

• S. E. Power is good value based on assets compared to the IN Chemicals industry average.

Cons

• S. E. Power is loss making, we can't compare its value to the IN Chemicals industry average.
• S. E. Power is loss making, we can't compare the value of its earnings to the India market.
• SEPOWER underperformed the Chemicals industry which returned 2.2% over the past year.
• SEPOWER underperformed the Market in India which returned -14.5% over the past year.
• NSEI:SEPOWER is down -13.2% underperforming the Chemicals industry which returned 6.9% over the past month.
• NSEI:SEPOWER is down -13.2% underperforming the market in India which returned 8% over the past month.