TVS Holdings Ltd
NSE: TVSHLTD BSE: 520056
₹13569
(1.19%)
Thu, 28 May 2026, 05:46 pm
Market Cap271.57B
PE Ratio16.19
Dividend0.64
- Overview
- Analysis
- Financials
- Ratios
- shareholding
- Technical Analysis
- Corporate Actions
- Peer Comparison
- About
- Company History
- Deals
- News
TVS Holdings Analysis
dividend
Pros
Cons
- Unable to calculate sustainability of dividends as Sundaram-Clayton has not reported any payouts.
- Unable to evaluate Sundaram-Clayton's dividend yield against the bottom 25% of dividend payers as the company has not reported any payouts.
- Unable to evaluate Sundaram-Clayton's dividend against the top 25% market benchmark as the company has not reported any payouts.
health
Pros
- Sundaram-Clayton is profitable, therefore cash runway is not a concern.
- Sundaram-Clayton is profitable, therefore cash runway is not a concern.
- Sundaram-Clayton's cash and other short term assets cover its long term commitments.
Cons
- Sundaram-Clayton's short term (1 year) commitments are greater than its holdings of cash and other short term assets.
- Debt is not well covered by operating cash flow (3.7%, less than 20% of total debt).
- Debt is not covered by short term assets, assets are 0.8x debt.
- The level of debt compared to net worth has increased over the past 5 years (86.5% vs 307.3% today).
- Interest payments on debt are not well covered by earnings (EBIT is 1.9x annual interest expense, ideally 3x coverage).
- Sundaram-Clayton's level of debt (307.3%) compared to net worth is high (greater than 40%).
- High level of physical assets or inventory.
management
Pros
- The average tenure for the Sundaram-Clayton board of directors is over 10 years, this suggests they are a seasoned and experienced board.
- Vivek's remuneration is lower than average for companies of similar size in India.
- The average tenure for the Sundaram-Clayton management team is over 5 years, this suggests they are a seasoned and experienced team.
Cons
misc
Pros
Cons
- Sundaram-Clayton is not covered by any analysts.
- Sundaram-Clayton has significant price volatility in the past 3 months.
past
Pros
- Sundaram-Clayton's year on year earnings growth rate has been positive over the past 5 years.
Cons
- Sundaram-Clayton's 1-year earnings growth is negative, it can't be compared to the 5-year average.
- Sundaram-Clayton used its assets less efficiently than the IN Auto Components industry average last year based on Return on Assets.
- Sundaram-Clayton's use of capital deteriorated last year versus 3 years ago (Return on Capital Employed).
- Sundaram-Clayton has not efficiently used shareholders’ funds last year (Return on Equity less than 20%).
- Sundaram-Clayton's 1-year earnings growth is negative, it can't be compared to the IN Auto Components industry average.
value
Pros
- Sundaram-Clayton is good value based on earnings compared to the IN Auto Components industry average.
- Sundaram-Clayton is good value based on earnings compared to the India market.
- NSEI:SUNCLAYLTD is up 16.5% outperforming the Auto Components industry which returned 13.2% over the past month.
- NSEI:SUNCLAYLTD is up 16.5% outperforming the market in India which returned 8% over the past month.
Cons
- Sundaram-Clayton is overvalued based on assets compared to the IN Auto Components industry average.
- SUNCLAYLTD underperformed the Auto Components industry which returned -22.4% over the past year.
- SUNCLAYLTD underperformed the Market in India which returned -14.5% over the past year.